🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."